Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > Discussion concerning Access products > General discussion about Access Virus

General discussion about Access Virus Discussion about Virus A, B, C and TI.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30.05.2009, 11:13 AM
Natspace's Avatar
Natspace Natspace is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 12.06.2008
Location: France
Posts: 64
Default

Humm I waiting for the feedback of the Snow'users, I don't want to be again and again a bêta tester. That very boring that Access Music can't give a stable OS like 2.75 when they make a new OS, the other manufacturers of synthetizers do not have as many problems.

Isn't we already rather expensive pay these fabulous machines, why Access Music rotten to make a stable OS as of its out? I imagine the frustration of the users of the TI2 which paid their Virus expensive and cannot even install version 2.75.

They must wait more than 3 months to have finally something of functional. Because much of people buy today a Virus TI for precisely using the function "TI". Very little use it on "Hardware". In any case it's the report which I make.
__________________
Virus model: Virus TI Snow
Virus OS: 4.0.5.01
PC1 -OS: Windows XP PRO SP2 64 Bit Edition
PC2 - OS: Windows 7 x64
Host Sequencer: Cubase 5
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/spacenat
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30.05.2009, 11:21 AM
telson's Avatar
telson telson is offline
Banned
Newbie
 
Join Date: 03.01.2009
Posts: 78
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natspace View Post
Humm I waiting for the feedback of the Snow'users, I don't want to be again and again a bêta tester. That very boring that Access Music can't give a stable OS like 2.75 when they make a new OS, the other manufacturers of synthetizers do not have as many problems.

Isn't we already rather expensive pay these fabulous machines, why Access Music rotten to make a stable OS as of its out? I imagine the frustration of the users of the TI2 which paid their Virus expensive and cannot even install version 2.75.

They must wait more than 3 months to have finally something of functional. Because much of people buy today a Virus TI for precisely using the function "TI". Very little use it on "Hardware". In any case it's the report which I make.

another misery statement
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30.05.2009, 11:35 AM
Splat! Splat! is offline
Infekted!
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 15.01.2009
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natspace View Post
Humm I waiting for the feedback of the Snow'users, I don't want to be again and again a b?ta tester. That very boring that Access Music can't give a stable OS like 2.75 when they make a new OS, the other manufacturers of synthetizers do not have as many problems.

Isn't we already rather expensive pay these fabulous machines, why Access Music rotten to make a stable OS as of its out? I imagine the frustration of the users of the TI2 which paid their Virus expensive and cannot even install version 2.75.

They must wait more than 3 months to have finally something of functional. Because much of people buy today a Virus TI for precisely using the function "TI". Very little use it on "Hardware". In any case it's the report which I make.
Cause TI OS 2.75 is all you deserve. Respect the fact that, they brought out OS 3.XX and allowed all TI users to upgrade and use it for free. Complete OS revisions are usually not free with other companies.
A stable OS lasts for years to come, so appreciate the fact that they undergo such intensive Beta testing.
No other company offers TI. So, quit whining.
________
TX650

Last edited by Splat! : 29.01.2011 at 10:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30.05.2009, 12:03 PM
Natspace's Avatar
Natspace Natspace is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 12.06.2008
Location: France
Posts: 64
Default

To Splat:

So for you it is normal to buy a machine with cost more than 2800$ by having an unstable os???

And when you buy a new car with a defective engine, what do you do?

I have anything against that Access Music improves the OS of TI with new functionality. I do not find simply normal that their new models leaves each time with a new OS not finished, each year it's similar.
__________________
Virus model: Virus TI Snow
Virus OS: 4.0.5.01
PC1 -OS: Windows XP PRO SP2 64 Bit Edition
PC2 - OS: Windows 7 x64
Host Sequencer: Cubase 5
----------------------------------------------------
http://www.myspace.com/spacenat

Last edited by Natspace : 30.05.2009 at 12:18 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30.05.2009, 12:39 PM
Timo's Avatar
Timo Timo is offline
Administrator
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 13.07.2003
Location: Kaoss Central, England
Posts: 2,562
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natspace View Post
To Splat:

So for you it is normal to buy a machine with cost more than 2800$ by having an unstable os???

And when you buy a new car with a defective engine, what do you do?

I have anything against that Access Music improves the OS of TI with new functionality. I do not find simply normal that their new models leaves each time with a new OS not finished, each year it's similar.
After the extensive betas, the latest OS v3.0.3.00 isn't a beta - it's a full release. They clearly feel the OS is mature and stable enough for everyone to use.

If you will feel more comfortable to wait until people have installed and road tested v3.0.3.00 for a while, then that's a given option for you.

What problems have you encounted with earlier v3.x.xx versions? Those issues may well have since been fixed.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01.06.2009, 12:05 PM
altunamusic altunamusic is offline
Coming down with a bug...
New here
 
Join Date: 01.04.2009
Posts: 13
Send a message via MSN to altunamusic Send a message via Yahoo to altunamusic
Question

Hi guys,

Too sad... i got very heavy latency since i upgrade to 3.03 and also.. Midi Channels Crash with each other on multiple mode

I use Logic Pro.8 n M-audo FW410 as soundcard...

anyone can help me out?

Thank you
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01.06.2009, 01:29 PM
Cantankerous Cantankerous is offline
Infekted!
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 16.01.2009
Posts: 137
Default

Hmmm, that introduced latency strikes me. I thought I noticed the same thing. Not a HUGE deal but definitely noticeable over previous OS versions which didn't seem quite as 'slow' to respond. I am running my ASIO drivers at 256 buffer size and am getting 5ms latency.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01.06.2009, 08:59 PM
civan civan is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 25.01.2009
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 69
Default

After installing the 3.03 release I went back to work on my current project. I'm running maybe 10 different TI channels but not all at once. Some of the channel have maybe 4 sources of automation at most. My Cubase still quits unexpectedly and also during live play, notes will drop from some of the more complicated lines.

I noticed a new problem with my Polar TI|2. While playing live, I was changing patches and messing around with the knobs under the LCD. The patch would play at first but then as soon as I moved the knob the value indicator would show some thing in the display like "32!5" and then the sound for that channel would disappear. I distinctly remember the exclamation mark. Weird stuff... and I can't recreate this problem.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05.06.2009, 07:30 PM
erolz erolz is offline
Am starting to like this forum
Newbie
 
Join Date: 08.12.2008
Posts: 84
Default

Hi,

i just downloaded and installed Virus Control 3.0.3.00 from the access website (
http://www.access-music.de/downloads.php4?product=virustidesktop#cat18)

I did not uninstall the previous version (2.7.5) but the installation went fine.
When i load a project in Cubase4, the midi timing is off sometimes never had this problem...
got my Snow connected trough usb (midi and audio).
With the previous VC i had no problems whatsover.

Any tips or advice?

also posted here:
http://www.infekted.org/virus/showthread.php?p=290934#post290934

wich VC do you all prefer with cubase4?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 30.05.2009, 02:55 PM
h4nc0 h4nc0 is offline
Definately caught something...
Very mucho Newbie
 
Join Date: 30.06.2008
Posts: 36
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Natspace View Post
Humm I waiting for the feedback of the Snow'users, I don't want to be again and again a b�ta tester. That very boring that Access Music can't give a stable OS like 2.75 when they make a new OS, the other manufacturers of synthetizers do not have as many problems.

Isn't we already rather expensive pay these fabulous machines, why Access Music rotten to make a stable OS as of its out? I imagine the frustration of the users of the TI2 which paid their Virus expensive and cannot even install version 2.75.

They must wait more than 3 months to have finally something of functional. Because much of people buy today a Virus TI for precisely using the function "TI". Very little use it on "Hardware". In any case it's the report which I make.
I've been using the betas with Snow here. VST3 version has some problem but VST2.x version worked fine here for quite a while.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:18 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org