Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > Discussion concerning Access products > Sound designing

Sound designing Discussion about sound designing with the Virus series synths. Share patches and your knowledge or ask questions.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 19.02.2008, 03:38 PM
Masterpace Masterpace is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 18.02.2008
Posts: 6
Default

Maybe should I be more specific. Starting at 1:30 (one minute 30 sec.) in the Ultimate Bass, is the kind of bass I'm more after. How can you get something close from the Virus? Thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 19.02.2008, 04:10 PM
IamEvil's Avatar
IamEvil IamEvil is offline
Knob Junkie
Amateur
 
Join Date: 07.01.2008
Posts: 181
Default

slightly distorted pulse/square wave sound with slow filter attack + some rez and compressed to hell

that should be pretty close

Last edited by IamEvil : 20.02.2008 at 10:22 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 20.02.2008, 11:01 AM
flipside's Avatar
flipside flipside is offline
Infektion taking hold...
Newbie
 
Join Date: 20.01.2008
Location: Hamar, Norway
Posts: 62
Send a message via Skype™ to flipside
Default

I don't have the virus in front of me right now, but try setting both osc 1 and sub osc to square, experiment with the level of the subosc in relation to osc 1, and you could also try setting osc 2 to +7 semi, and mix it in, being careful to let osc1 be the dominant. Try the digital distortion, and see what's best of doing it at the filter saturation or in the effects section.

Also, try this: set the sustain slope to its maximum negative setting. Set attack to 0. Now, try setting a balance between decay, sustain and release to make the sound the length you want it to be.

Oh and try and set Osc Init Phase to 32.

This in combination with the amp envelope makes it sound almost like a sample

Sorry if this sounds somewhat vague, I can make some examples later today.

Best,
Alex
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 20.02.2008, 08:09 PM
Masterpace Masterpace is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 18.02.2008
Posts: 6
Default

flipside, I'm going to try a few of your settings tonight. I'm currently at work! Tell me, a square is a pulse with 50 % width, right? I'm using a puse around 65 %. Is that o.k.? I find it gives a more "buzzing" effect. As for oscillator 2, would you use exactly the same waveform but with 7 semitones above? What about FM? Is that required and how could I use it? I forgot about the negative sustain slope. It helps cut off the bass quickly even though the key is pressed so that's a good one. Oscillator init phase to 32? Quite interesting. I will try it also. Regarding the compressor, I could get some nice compression from my onboard digital compressor on the console. I use heavy compression though (10/1 ratio, null attack, hard knee, few ms release, high output gain). It definitely pumps the "oomph". There's just one slight problem though: a few spikes don't seem to get compressed at all and because of the output gain, they just get bigger. Any idea?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 21.02.2008, 03:57 AM
Masterpace Masterpace is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 18.02.2008
Posts: 6
Default

Alex (flipside), you made my day! I've modified my patch to more or less match your settings and the result is impressive to my hears. A few notes:

-Using a bit of digital distorsion really helps.
-The filters should have some high rectifier saturation.
-Using a quick negative slope on the filter enveloppe makes the bassline much tighter, less muddy.
-For some reason, boosting the signal send to phaser gives a lot of "body" to the bass and makes a huge difference. I don't know why though.
-Using proper EQ and a lot of compression and voila!

The only thing I would like to change is that there's a slight buzzing sound in the background. It's like detuned and can be heard on lower notes. Increasing the initial phase (from 32 to 36 for instance) gets rid of it but alters tonality (bass is higher pitched). So, I prefer to keep it 32.

Any ideas?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 21.02.2008, 03:59 AM
Masterpace Masterpace is offline
New here
New here
 
Join Date: 18.02.2008
Posts: 6
Default

Alex (flipside), you made my day! I've modified my patch to more or less match your settings and the result is impressive to my hears. A few notes:

-Using a bit of digital distorsion really helps.
-The filters should have some high rectifier saturation.
-Using a quick negative slope on the filter enveloppe makes the bassline much tighter, less muddy.
-For some reason, boosting the signal send to phaser gives a lot of "body" to the bass and makes a huge difference. I don't know why though.
-Using proper EQ and a lot of compression and voila!

The only thing I would like to change is that there's a slight buzzing sound in the background. It's like detuned and can be heard on lower notes. Increasing the initial phase (from 32 to 36 for instance) gets rid of it but alters tonality (bass is higher pitched). So, I prefer to keep it 32.

Any ideas?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org