Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > General discussion > General discussion about music production

General discussion about music production Discussion concerning music production, composing, studio work, sequencing, software, etc.

View Poll Results: Which do you prefer?
Cubase 11 50.00%
Sonar 2 9.09%
Pro Tools 1 4.55%
Logic 8 36.36%
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23.02.2007, 11:09 PM
Doc Jones's Avatar
Doc Jones Doc Jones is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 12.01.2005
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 1,346
Default

very well put Khazul. I was going to write something similar when I got out of work, but you beat me to it

Keep in mind, I am a big fan of cubase. Started using cubase back in the 3.7 days, upgraded to version 5.x, then moved over to sx1, then to 2 and finally on to 3. It was kind of a fluke that I picked up Ableton.

Took me a while to really get good at using ableton (the session view was a whole new way of thinking for me) and now that I have a year of experience with it, I have to say, hands down Live is most functional and flexible daw for me. Live lets a musician be a musician (while still giving you all the capabilities of a world class daw). I couldn't imaging try to compose again on cubase.

Up to this point, I still had been doing my mastering in cubase, but am now bringing this phase over to Live as well.

It's just an all around great piece of software.

Last edited by Doc Jones : 24.02.2007 at 01:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24.02.2007, 01:17 AM
Khazul's Avatar
Khazul Khazul is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 08.07.2005
Location: Reading, UK
Posts: 1,045
Send a message via MSN to Khazul
Default

My main problem with live so far is that when you using high latency plugins (UAD mastering suite for eg), then the visible location of the sings point ceases to have much relationship with what you hear.

And so when you staring at audio waveforms looking for a specific bit that you want to tweak then you need to disable/remove all the high latency plugins so you can see what your doing again.

I dont ever remember Cubase SX3/4 compounding latency to this extent - I think live seems to add a whole laods of extra latency between plugins that way above that added by Cubase.

Hence I find myself having to keep high latency plugs out and use cheapo compressors where I would rather be using a UAD compresor for eg.

The song position marker definately needs latency compensation applying to it, or the option to compensate it.

Otherwise, excellent application.

Last edited by Khazul : 24.02.2007 at 01:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PROBLEM! When i Bounce a Logic track with logic Happens djcoq Trouble with your Access Virus? 8 22.05.2006 08:33 PM
Digi 002 or Cubase/Logic? DIGITAL SCREAMS General discussion about music production 8 05.11.2005 12:29 AM
virus TI x Protools LE 6.9 simonw Trouble with your Access Virus? 1 16.10.2005 08:08 AM
Patch scripts for ProTools LE jasedee General discussion about Access Virus 0 11.08.2005 07:00 AM
ProTools/Rewire-Reason Questions..... jasedee Studio equipment 4 15.10.2004 08:19 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:41 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org