TI: Too Perfect?

[grs]

I might miss the sloppyness of hardware timing, even though sample tight integration is 90% of the reason I'm getting the TI.
Maybe there will be parrameters for 'non-sync', 'midi latency' or 'arp wobble'. I can see my self adding a bit of offset and random to certain channels in Nuendo
(the other 10% is polyphony)

[jasedee]

Perhaps......Sometimes those timing 'issues' make it feel more 'human'???

[saba]

In essense, its basically the only synth you'll need. Most listeners of music aren't evangelical about how analogue a bassline sounds, or whatever. You have pretty much everything you need in a TI for electronica and pop music.

Mind you, its not like people like us will be satisfied with only a single synthesizer
________
Magic flight vaporizer review

[jasedee]

Originally Posted by saba

Mind you, its not like people like us will be satisfied with only a single synthesizer

Very true....I need at least 10 and I've only got one VA, and one rompler.....I've a long way to go

[grs]

Originally I sold a Roland JD800 and two JX3P and a KAWAI K2 to get the Virus b. But back to the topic.
Another new parrameter in the new TI could be '18bit 48KHz DA emulate amount'. Don't forget that the output stage has it's own unique flavour.

[jasedee]

Whilst we're at it, why dont we add some old OS bugs, like jumpy knobs, just to make it feel like a good ol Access Virus C You know, for nostalgia

[Hollowcell]

Originally Posted by jasedee

Whilst we're at it, why dont we add some old OS bugs, like jumpy knobs, just to make it feel like a good ol Access Virus C You know, for nostalgia

It's only the rack that has that there trouble Jase. My desktop has wonderful knob playability - much like it's owner. Hehe, crude I know...

[blay]

Originally Posted by Hollowcell

My desktop has wonderful knob playability - much like it's owner.

pity about the response times eh HC

[Hollowcell]

All the latest talk about timing is really over hyped (now that you bring it up Blay).

Latency/timing only became an issue when the first softsynths hit the scene. However, there were people setting up huge daisy chains of equipment creating slopy timing, but appart from that, midi is no problem what so ever - specially if set up right.

As long as the sequncer is recording and playing back exactly what I've played going in, then that's all I need.

I can run 16 channels of midi, with over dubbed CC automation, going out to alot of different hardware while at the same time having it all synced to midi clock with no glitches at all! I'm happy enough.

The TI being too perfect? Wavetable, hypersaw, full multi-timbral functions including FX and 80 voices does sit pretty high in my books, but sample tight intergration is not that high on my list.

[blay]

Originally Posted by Hollowcell

All the latest talk about timing is really over hyped (now that you bring it up Blay).

hehe

Originally Posted by Hollowcell

The TI being too perfect? Wavetable, hypersaw, full multi-timbral functions including FX and 80 voices does sit pretty high in my books, but sample tight intergration is not that high on my list.

i absolutely agree HC. but i guess they have to fill up the press releases with something