Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > General discussion > Studio equipment

Studio equipment An area for general discussion about studio equipment, excluding Access products which have a dedicated area.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25.02.2008, 08:06 PM
plaid_emu plaid_emu is offline
Infekted!
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 03.02.2008
Posts: 111
Default RME 400 vs. 800

OK, so I'm sacrificing half of my gear on the alter of eBay in the quest for better sound and the hopes of streamlining my workflow.

I've decided to go back to mixing OTB with a Speck Xsum and an RME 400 after the auctions end. I'm using ADAM A7's and Monster Cables, so I'm alright on that side. Probably need some more room treatment eventually.

Before I buy these though, I'd like to get some details about the whole 400 vs. 800 debate. I've been searching some posts on audio forums and some say the 400 sounds worse than the 800. Others say they're the same. Then there's another camp who say the A/D conversion on the 400 is superior to the 800, but the D/A conversion on the 800 is better than the 400. If I email RME and ask them, they'll probably say they're the same.

If anyone's interested, here's what I decided to keep:

Access Virus TI (desktop), DSI Evolver (desktop), Waldorf Blofeld, Spectral Audio Neptune II, Focusrite Trakmaster (with A/D card), TC Electronic Triple C (multiband comp), ESI M4U (MIDI interface), Monster Power 2500 (x2)

Keeping my live setup the same:

(MPC-1000, Waldorf Micro Q Phoenix, Alesis Photon X25, Lexicon MX 400, Ashly line mixer)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25.02.2008, 09:19 PM
DIGITAL SCREAMS's Avatar
DIGITAL SCREAMS DIGITAL SCREAMS is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
Default

I use the FF800. Sound quality in the 400 is exactly the same. Specs wise there are some differences.....but your getting the same convertors.

DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS

The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26.02.2008, 11:43 AM
Drammy's Avatar
Drammy Drammy is offline
Forum Saviour
Aged Veteran
 
Join Date: 08.04.2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 892
Default

Are you going to use Firewire 800 as well?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26.02.2008, 01:20 PM
plaid_emu plaid_emu is offline
Infekted!
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 03.02.2008
Posts: 111
Default

Thanks for the input, Digital.

Drammy, I'm just using an Intel MacMini right now, so no FW 800.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26.02.2008, 07:38 PM
Drammy's Avatar
Drammy Drammy is offline
Forum Saviour
Aged Veteran
 
Join Date: 08.04.2003
Location: Leeds, UK
Posts: 892
Default

I tried using a FireFace 800 over Firewire 400 and found a number of problems. I was never satisfied with it. I ended up buying a PCIe Firewire 800 card and then all was well.

I was using a PC, but it was an excellent build, just let down by the Firewire 400.

I recommend checking this out first. RME have some excellent newsgroups accessible via their website. There are some very knowledgeable guys on there that will give you an honest answer... I'd check that out...

Actually, thought I'd find the link for ya instead: news://news.x-networks.de/rme-audio.forum


Cheers,
Drammy
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26.02.2008, 08:26 PM
plaid_emu plaid_emu is offline
Infekted!
Almost Amateur
 
Join Date: 03.02.2008
Posts: 111
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drammy View Post
I tried using a FireFace 800 over Firewire 400 and found a number of problems. I was never satisfied with it. I ended up buying a PCIe Firewire 800 card and then all was well.

I was using a PC, but it was an excellent build, just let down by the Firewire 400.

I recommend checking this out first. RME have some excellent newsgroups accessible via their website. There are some very knowledgeable guys on there that will give you an honest answer... I'd check that out...

Actually, thought I'd find the link for ya instead: news://news.x-networks.de/rme-audio.forum


Cheers,
Drammy
Thanks for sharing your experience and the tip. Nice of you to provide the link. It's much appreciated.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04.03.2008, 07:06 AM
DIGITAL SCREAMS's Avatar
DIGITAL SCREAMS DIGITAL SCREAMS is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by plaid_emu View Post
Thanks for the input, Digital.

Drammy, I'm just using an Intel MacMini right now, so no FW 800.
Actually I need to qualify something here...and to quote Daniel Fuchs of RME Support:

The FF 400 uses a combined ADDA chip (AK 4620), while the FF800 has separate chips (5385/4395). S/N and THD for AD are almost identical, DA specs are marginally better on the FF800. The preamps, however, have been slightly improved.

In other words, nothing to get caught up on

DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS

The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:35 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org