Access Virus & Virus TI community since 2002 Virus TI Infekted

Go Back   The Unofficial Access Virus & Virus TI Forum - since 2002 > General discussion > General discussion about music production

General discussion about music production Discussion concerning music production, composing, studio work, sequencing, software, etc.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09.06.2005, 07:21 PM
techno_7 techno_7 is offline
Pro
Pro
 
Join Date: 07.05.2005
Location: Jylland, Denmark
Posts: 370
Send a message via MSN to techno_7
Default

SX 1.

I have just bought SX 3.0 which will arrive to me approximatly monday
__________________
HP Pc, Dual Core 3.0 GhZ, 1 Gb RAM
EMU 1212 Soundcard
Access Virus
Korg Karma
Behringer DDX3216 mixer
4 Mach M-Flex Monitors
Reason 2.5
Cubase SX3
Korg Legacy Collection
http://www.t7online.dk/Data/T7online%20SkySigHQ.gif
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09.06.2005, 11:44 PM
Hollowcell Hollowcell is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 20.05.2003
Location: Earth
Posts: 3,053
Default

Usually start the initial loop on the sequencer in my JX305, then move over to Cubase VST32 once I start recording audio parts.
__________________
HCs solo work at
http://www.myspace.com/hollowcellbeats
Sound designs at
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/8/hollowcell.htm
HCs and JCs colab project at
http://www.myspace.com/rhythmusimblut
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10.06.2005, 09:02 AM
Panopticon's Avatar
Panopticon Panopticon is offline
Semi Pro
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: 04.09.2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 219
Send a message via MSN to Panopticon
Default

Wow, Cubase is popular.

I use Digital Performer, like it a lot. Tried everything else, and I used Cubase for 6 months back in the SX1 days, but I've been on DP for a few years now, don't care to switch anytime soon.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10.06.2005, 10:04 AM
Tomer=Trance's Avatar
Tomer=Trance Tomer=Trance is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 25.07.2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,029
Send a message via ICQ to Tomer=Trance Send a message via MSN to Tomer=Trance
Default

most of use are pc users,personaly i cobase is my choice for pc platform.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10.06.2005, 01:06 PM
Onkel Dunkel's Avatar
Onkel Dunkel Onkel Dunkel is offline
Aged Veteran
Aged Veteran
 
Join Date: 12.08.2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 908
Default

I used a Emu XL-7 (harware) for some time but found it anoying to mess around with a 2 line display and when i got my Virus it was a pain in the ass to sequense it from the XL-7. Anyway the XL-7 dosn?t support audio sequensing and you can?t use VSTi?s in it so that also limits it quite a bit. Now i only use the XL-7 as a sound module. All sequensing is done in Cubase. It?s a lot easier to work with as you don?t have to scroll through menus, you can actually see what your doing, you can view draw parameter changes with the mouse, etc. etc. etc.
__________________
If you go to bed with a scratchy ass, you will wake up with smelly fingers...

http://www.myspace.com/onkeldunkeldk
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10.06.2005, 06:22 PM
Fasttracker's Avatar
Fasttracker Fasttracker is offline
Very mucho Newbie
Very mucho Newbie
 
Join Date: 05.04.2005
Posts: 35
Default

Yeah cubase is really popular but i always heard that digital performer is better , not sure why tho.
I'm liking cubase too , i bought the cubase xtc pack witch is cubase sx with the tc native bundle 3 for 700 euro's and was super glad when they told me it came with a free upgrade to sx 3.
I have used cubase , Logic , cakewalk and protools (not very long but i used it) and i sticked with cubase .

Yeah hollowcell , i'm going to try something similar too , make a starting loop on my mpc and when it starts to take shape i'll sync it up to cubase and start to add the synths and do the sequencing. I am gunna try that out , still looking for my method of working (see previous post http://www.sunesha.nu/virusforum/vie...ghlight=#35523 ) and this seems pretty promising.
With this method i can render my synth or mpc to audio in cubase super-fast and add some vst effects and stuff withc i usually did in the mixing stage because it was too mutch work and disturbed my creative flow.

Greetz...
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10.06.2005, 07:02 PM
3o3's Avatar
3o3 3o3 is offline
Super Moderator
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 16.10.2002
Location: Stockholm, Sweden
Posts: 1,645
Send a message via MSN to 3o3
Default

I'd love to have a hardware sequencer (RS7000). but i dont have the cash for it.

And i don't use any other sequencer right now. I haven't done any music in ages.
__________________
if i had to choose between my Girlfriend and my Roland TB-303, guess what i would choose!

"Welcome to the Berserk-Inn - If one customer is difficult, no-one survives" - http://www.4barloop.com/
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11.06.2005, 01:12 AM
Gopal's Avatar
Gopal Gopal is offline
Pro
Pro
 
Join Date: 15.10.2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 432
Default

I been using Cubase for months, just switched to Logic Platinum 5.5.1 (PC) and my workrate has gone through the roof. It really is Logical to me and Cubase would never let me integrate the hardware via midi properly. Within 5 mins I was able to do all the things in Logic I had been trying to do in Cubase for months. Logic sounds phatter and drier to my ears too. Easier to hear whats going on in the mix and find space for instruments.

Just my experience
__________________
Cubase 4.5.2 Motu 896, Access Virus B, Novation Bass station, Novation Drumstation v2, Remote Zero, Roland SH32, Dynaudio BM5a monitors, Dynaudio BM9s sub,
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page...?bandID=455128
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11.06.2005, 04:34 AM
Tomer=Trance's Avatar
Tomer=Trance Tomer=Trance is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 25.07.2002
Location: Israel
Posts: 2,029
Send a message via ICQ to Tomer=Trance Send a message via MSN to Tomer=Trance
Default

the interface of logic is so hard to get use to for me,a cubase user.

was the transition diffecult?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11.06.2005, 06:55 AM
Panopticon's Avatar
Panopticon Panopticon is offline
Semi Pro
Semi-Pro
 
Join Date: 04.09.2003
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 219
Send a message via MSN to Panopticon
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gopal
Logic sounds phatter and drier to my ears too. Easier to hear whats going on in the mix and find space for instruments.
Ha! I would say your ears need checking. I've heard ProTools, Logic, DP, Live, and Cubase through Digi, Apogee, and MOTU D/A, and on 3 different sets of monitors (KRK, Mackie, and NS-10's). On a *really* good day, you can hear a change when switching D/A converters. I've never met anyone who could blindly hear the difference betwen DAW programs.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Creating drum sequencers in Cubase rfinch General discussion about music 1 29.04.2008 06:31 PM
Analog sequencers... DIGITAL SCREAMS Studio equipment 0 05.03.2006 06:01 PM
Software Sequencers Nigel Harkness General discussion about music production 36 16.12.2004 10:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:58 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org