General discussion about Access Virus Discussion about Virus A, B, C and TI. |
28.05.2005, 07:42 AM
|
|
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Well thats just it i3......I cant really run VSTI's on my desktop despite its high spec. I mean, alot of the sounds ive loaded into CS80v for example were using like 60%+ cpu on ust 4 note polly. Just crazy....
Softsynths will come into their own, once most people are using dual or quad processors and 64 bit......
But even then....softsynths wont be finding their way into my studio. Hate the things....
DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|
28.05.2005, 07:49 AM
|
|
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 08.11.2004
Location: Melb, AUS
Posts: 1,097
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DIGITAL SCREAMS
But even then....softsynths wont be finding their way into my studio. Hate the things....
DS
|
we'll see DS.
Give it a year or two and you will be eating those words
cheers
blay
|
28.05.2005, 10:55 AM
|
|
Pro
Pro
|
|
Join Date: 14.12.2004
Posts: 492
|
|
I hate those soft synths too which use too much cpu. I use only light native plugins (mostly logic plugins) and dsp powered plugins and most of the synth sound come from my hardware "reason" rack.
|
28.05.2005, 11:29 AM
|
|
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 11.12.2003
Location: Northern Beaches - Sydney, Australia
Posts: 2,755
|
|
I dont actually own any softsynths/VSTi's........well, I guess Reason could be classed as one, but still I only use Reason for it's drum machine.
I think regardless of how softsynths are advancing in terms of sound quality and CPU usage, I will always buy a hardware synth before I succumb to this crazy trend.
Bah humbug
__________________
MYSPACE
G5, Cubase SX, Reason 2.5, Acess Virus RackXL, Yamaha Motif Rack, Yamaha CS-10, Roland D-50, Korg X5D, Korg Electribe ER-1mkII, HALion VST Sampler, MOTU 2408mkIII, Studer 169, Roland JUNO 60
|
28.05.2005, 02:00 PM
|
Almost Amateur
Almost Amateur
|
|
Join Date: 23.04.2005
Location: http://www.futurlab.blogspot.com
Posts: 147
|
|
haha!
this argument cracks me up. old technology vs. new technology.
Sooner or later the people embracing new tools unavailable in dedicated hardware form will be outstretching the sound capabilities possible with old technologies. People using old technologies will sound old.
Thus time plods on, with the new age embracing the new technology, and the people stuck in their ways continuing to be stuck in their ways, and moaning about why people can't appreciate the old way of doing things...
If people don't embrace new technologies, informed by tradition, we would still be writing on papyrus and complaining about the quality of type compared to ink...
yawn.
__________________
\\ \\\
\\\\\\ G5, JP80X0, Logic Pro, SuperCollider, Virus TI, DrumStation v2, Aphex 204, TL Audio 5021
|
28.05.2005, 11:03 PM
|
|
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pseudonym
If people don't embrace new technologies....
|
I'd like to respond to this...but hang on a sec...my legs arn't what they used to be ever since I got cracked copy of Pro53.
DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|
28.05.2005, 11:07 PM
|
|
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 09.11.2002
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Actually, Id like to go one step further and state that I actually think all these soft 'analogs' sound very shite to my ears.
More power to you if your music heavily relies on them muhahahahahah
Only joking....softsynths are da best!
Oh dear I should knock off the sarcasm....but its real difficult when you've just spent 4 hours of quality time with a Prophet 5
DS
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/user/DIGITALSCREAMS
The SynthWizard has some advice - Back in the 1980's music was better, TV was better, films were better. Not to mention fashion.... Let me help you relive the past with some classic 80's sounds from my vintage synth collection....
|
29.05.2005, 12:36 AM
|
|
Veteran
Veteran
|
|
Join Date: 01.10.2002
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 650
|
|
guys...i mean, COME ON!
it's really obvious to see that some people have their own preference lol
let's not start a software/hardware debate topic #183 in this thread
Personally I think that softsynths are really "getting there", too bad most of them are way too cpu hungry. Anyone saying that softsynths OR hardware sucks is most definately way too narrow minded :P
|
29.05.2005, 01:05 AM
|
|
Analog synth DSP lover
Amateur
|
|
Join Date: 31.12.2003
Location: somewhere in cali.
Posts: 155
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MADSTATION
let's not start a software/hardware debate topic #183 in this thread
|
we are hangin by string waiting for this TI. we have to keep our mind away from this scandal. ya but it is personal preference. me myself love the old warm analog sound compared to the emulated va but technology goes a step forward each time with new suprises around the corner that make them sound better and better. If only we could take the old analog and put it in our pc or intergrate it with out the cpu load would just be the dream. Im thinking to myself when am I going to wake up from this TI nightmare!
|
29.05.2005, 01:36 AM
|
|
Administrator
This forum member lives here
|
|
Join Date: 13.07.2003
Location: Kaoss Central, England
Posts: 2,561
|
|
A couple or so forthcoming generations of computer in time will spawn software studios of stunning quality and quantity (instances) of each software synth, where every nuance is catered for, and additions that far exceed what hardware is capable of doing.
When CPU resources become truly abundant, powercore's and other external DSP gear etc. may not even be needed! What comes around, goes around.
Even EQ will eventually be coded to sound excellent, and you'll be able to use several instances of luscious convolution reverb in each song. Everything is heading towards convolution anyway, be it reverb, effects, EQ, dynamics, mic-pre modelling.... literally everything.
Access really need to go places with this TI, and the TI v2 (if/whenever), imho. I was kinda hoping Access' next synth (what we now know as the TI) would make more of a splash with new and diverse features. It sounds great and everything, but really only the Hypersaw and wavetables are new (synthesis wise). The rest is as per the Virus C - just "more of", and the added software control.
I really hope we get to hear more of the TI soon. =/
__________________
PS > And another thing! Will the Ti|3 have user customisable/importable wavetables? A ribbon-controller or XY-Pad might be nice, too, please! Thanks!
|
Thread Tools |
Search this Thread |
|
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:58 AM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4 Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Skin Designed by: Talk vBulletin
Copyright ©2002-2022, Infekted.org
|