Why can’t Virus use “Samples” for oscillators?

[synthman1]

>Wrong end of the USB cable goes into the virus. The virus is the USB slave and not the USB master controller.

Wait a min. If you store the samples on flash ram drive externally and connect it to the Virus, in theory, how would accessibility be any different than if you connected the flash drive to a computer to play mp3's or samples from it? The USB interface is 2 way communication, right? Maybe Access can clarify.

>Ha ha , you would be happy with 16MB ram ? How much ram do you think is actually available inside the Ti ?

That’s why all 3 of my suggested options used other methods than internal storage include 2 option for using the audio inputs.

>It's a lovely idea but I really doubt the virus hardware is made for it. Maybe some lofi user wavetables which take up about 50k each or something but PCM samples is probably going too far.

Not to over simplify this, unless Access can clarify, the virus is really a computer with modifiable software, essentially "a softsynth in a hardware host". Theoretically Access could rewrite the entire OS to make the Virus be something completely different if they choose to only limited to the amount of physical storage size for the OS.

This is how Access was able to add the Phaser effect in the B and the Moog filter in the C, right? It's just software, 1's and 0s.