Song #1
i have to disagree about the orchestral hits. . .i think they work. it gives the song a nice reference to Depeche Mode.
The drum sounds are ok in my opinion, however the programming is a little too static. creating a little deviation in the drum patterns, or overlaying some syncopated or polyrythmic parts would go a long way toward increasing the dynamic range of the song.
Song #2
nice late 80's Micheal Jackson feel right off the bat
i would like to hear the bass a little more "in your face" on this one, maybe a fatter patch or double it with a sub bass.
there is a melodic part that comes in about 2/3 of the way into the song, its MUCH better than the glitchy sound in the lead (which is still OK). i would like to hear the melody of that part come to the fore more.
high percussive part that is being used on the offbeats about half way through is cool.
i think overall i would reccomend a more linear approach to layering the various melodies and rhythms to progress the tune toward a climactic end. its a good tune, but a little disorganized and seems like it just sort of ambles up to the end
Song #3
Nice! i like the harder drums on this one immediately. very Depeche Mode !
again id like to hear a whole polyrhythmic part as a breakdown riffing off of the initial drum parts.
lead sound with the note bends not my favorite, but i kind of hate note bends so you can disregard it as personal taste.
i really like the bounce the second or third melody adds to the feel about half way through the song.
the more i listen the more annoyed the bent lead makes me. again, personal taste.
again, really want to hear a total DM style drum breakdown.
Overall:
im gonna say based on what i hear of your programming you should explore layered rhythms more. the material you have is good and could really benefit from the enhanced dynamics layered rhythms could add. Reccomended listening for this stuff: later Depeche Mode (can you tell i like DM?
)