Yes, I found it interesting that they are doing their best to 'dance around the semantics' and to be determined NOT to use 'virtual analog' in describing what they have done and to be releasing.
Seems to be VA, just by yet another term given by Roland.
Makes one wonder then, what then, were all the 'MC-xxx' machines in Roland's minds in which they at ad nausea, after Roland seemed to wash their hands of 'Analog'?
Was there a special anagram for that as well? LOL
perhaps I am missing something??! Why does this not excite me?
There's something to be said of the term, "beating a dead horse".
Please correct me if I am entirely missing something 'new'.
Seems to be more of Roland's wish to 'cash-in' on the 'Analog Spring'.
Cannot wait to see how Yamaha may perhaps in same vein of thought, redefines their 'XG/General Midi' term to perhaps try to do same (I am being sardonic because would be really surprised if a recreated/new CS-Series real analog came about), as Yamaha is so huge they no longer even need to innovate as Korg has chosen again to do.
Just my opinion. We all have them.
