Quote:
Originally Posted by LF2600
I am agree, but the sound is still hidden Behind and take dsp...
The idea was to free maximum dsp, with minimum, i know now the edit patch without any treatment is the best.
But my question is How back to édit patch after loading and trying lots of them ?
|
I don't think it works like you're imagining it does, because if it did, it would mean that the 16-part TI2, which has twice the DSP of the Snow but four times as many multi-timbral parts available, would only be capable of achieving roughly the same total overall throughput as the Snow (or perhaps less), because it would mean that even when muted, Virus control was always grinding out the overhead of 16 parts running INIT (meaning for any given multi timbral setup, an additional 12 parts would be wasting DSP needlessly). I think if you play around with both the Snow and TI2 desktop in practice you'll find this is not the case. Might want to confirm with Access, just for peace of mind.
Besides, even if muting a part did not have the intended effect, the overhead of an INIT patch isn't going to impact your DSP as much as one might think. It's not raw oscillators that gobble CPU, it's the processing involved in unisoning them, and more importantly adding envelope variations (particularly release time), and then FX to them (monster impact).
I'm fairly sure muting it removes the DSP impact at all though. It would be silly for it to work any other way (experiment with the CPU impact of a soft synth under same conditions, and I think you may agree with the theory).