View Single Post
  #8  
Old 08.11.2011, 10:58 PM
MBTC MBTC is offline
This forum member lives here
This forum member lives here
 
Join Date: 16.04.2010
Posts: 1,082
Default

In that case, you might be thrilled with it. On the Virus (and I suspect most modern synths), the notion of parts / voices / polyphony is kind of a misnomer at least in terms of paper specs of a synth. On the Virus Ti you'll see a little meter that tells you the "complexity" of the sound (i.e. how processor hungry it is), so things like polyphony will vary based on which sound you chose. I've told this story before, but when I had a Ti2, I remember loading a factory patch called D50 bells or something similar, that did infact sound like a Roland D50, but I think I was able to get at most 5 simultaneous notes out of it, and to the best of my knowledge that was taking the juice off the entire board. All of this surprised me because I never thought of "bells", or FM synthesis in particular as being processor heavy.

That said though, if one part for you is usually 1 osc and 1 filter and no effects, theres a good chance you'll be happy with the results, and that a lot of what I've said wouldn't apply to your case, however part of the real selling points of the modern Virus are the DAW integration, USB, etc.. so if you just want the raw Virus sound you might want to just pick up an older model used. I don't think any of them have sequencers built in? I always thought that was a primary requirement for a standalone workstation.
Reply With Quote