Quote:
|
Originally Posted by TOTAL
Not entirely precise arpeggiator, system hangups, satan saw, clicks ? these are things which I have learnt to live with. As I am not recording a CD yet so I can theoretically tolerate these issues now.
At this stage I see I treat TI like an ?ill? band-mate, moody, unreliable, boasting as the 7th wonder, glorified by 58 mags as the best you can get in 2006.. Did those mags test the TI or accept some advertisement purchase instead?
(Besides, has the year finished?)
Way fewer than the quoted 1800 voices, up to 2-4 fully effect-loaded parts playable at a time, not without tempo artefacts though, make me create things totally different from what I had the right to expect given the flashy advertisements. Wanted to make trance; I actually make simple quiet tunes with without arpeggiators. That is what my TI enables. Some may say ?I do make trance, what is your excuse now??. But do not know any of them personally.
I fully agree with the previous posters trance without arps or loads of fx, even as simple as reverb or delay is no longer this genre.
|
im sorry but i have to disagree. if you think you need arps and hardware reverb and delay to be "trance" you really need to re-evaluate your qualities as a musician. i never use arps because i think they are a form of cheating, i program all my rhythms myself. the presets that have arps on my synth work fine. i made some tracks with heavy everything with no troubles. perhaps it is as some people said, defective hardware?