View Single Post
  #12  
Old 14.04.2005, 12:48 PM
Derek's Avatar
Derek Derek is offline
Very mucho Newbie
Very mucho Newbie
 
Join Date: 26.03.2005
Posts: 38
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by grs
Quote:
RME Digiface is WAAAAYYYY more advanced. It can handle 52 channels of digital IO and has an onboard DSP with real time monitoring...
There again you think the mention of DSP suggests you can use it for what ever you plan. The RME DSP is for Summing and Routing only, even their Digicheck software (anylisers, etc) uses Native CPU.

I agree that the Offical blurbs on the TI point out all the differences to the C and don't talk about it in the sense that some people who were just born might not grasp what the TI is exactly... It's a synth.
I know it a synth... But Access also claims the TI is the most advanced laptop interface ever. I just don't see how it is. It's a synth with a few bells and whistles... That's it. I don't need the extra inputs; I could really care less about audio streaming. So what does that leave? VST and the synth engine. The real advantage to VST is to make up for a poor hardware user interface. I understand you can't even program the arpeggiator directly from hardware. Anyway that leaves the synth engine, and that is the only thing that will now convince me that the TI is worth the $$$. If it's absolutely amazing I will happily part with my money. If it is anything less they can keep their TI.

You may feel differently. Perhaps the synth engine is less important, if you really need those inputs.
__________________
They say time is the fire that burns within us.
Reply With Quote