Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blank
Im going to leave you to your opinion because you are obviously overlly biased...you explaination of texture is still undefined..
|
Well....I have come to the conclusions because of what I have used. I have a digital setup at home, with some good quality analogue gear, the best of both worlds really..
And then I have used some really nice gear...beautifully designed vintage analogue gear, and it sounds absolutely gorgeous. IMO, a hell of alot better than the digital gear I have used
Quote:
Hit a snare....
The first sound your hear is the attack right? Which usually grabs our attention. The texture of the snare is not in the attack, but in what comes after this. This is where the body of the snare lies, and this is what digital doesnt do so well...
Digital is great at capturing the attack....not so good at capturing all the rest
And just because something is percievably "unmeasurable", doesnt mean that it is not valid, or does not affect our sense of perception. There is alot of psycho-acoustical phenomena happening, that cannot be qualified or quantified, but exists all the same, and defines what our ears perceive as "musical" or "pleasing"
|
I thought that summed up texture quite nicely... Didnt you????